<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/templates/default/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
 xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"> 
<channel>
<title>David H Boggs, MS Search Marketing </title>


<link>https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog</link>

<description>
David H Boggs, MS provides expert search marketing, SEO and Google Ads services to Maine businesses.
</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<atom:link href="https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/rssfeed.php?catid=49" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<title>Social media falling behind Google in sending traffic to publisher sites</title>


<description>Google search steady at 17%, Facebook down 40%</description>

<link>https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/mobile-search-marketing/social-media-falling-behind-google-in-sending-traffic-to-publisher-sites-3927-thread.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 13:59:30 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/mobile-search-marketing/social-media-falling-behind-google-in-sending-traffic-to-publisher-sites-3927-thread.html</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/ckuploader.php?action=viewimage&amp;image=cHVibGlzaGVydHJhZmZpYzVmNTgucG5n" style="height:100%; width:100%" /></p>  <h1><span style="color:#990000"><strong>Social media falling behind Google in sending traffic to publisher sites</strong></span></h1>  <p><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>A new report from social analytics platform</strong> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://chartbeat.com/"><u><strong>Chartbeat </strong></u></a> shows that <strong>social media&#39;s share</strong> of traffic sent to news sites has dropped by a third - from 6% in January 2023 to 4% now. Traffic from <strong>Facebook</strong> is down by more than 40%.</span></p>  <p><span style="font-size:18px">In the same timeframe, traffic from <strong>Google Search</strong> has held steady at around a 17% share, the share of<strong> external traffic</strong> (from sites that are neither search nor social) has increased from 16% to 20%, and the traffic share of <strong>Google Discover</strong> - which offers personalized content recommendations in Google&#39;s mobile apps - has increased by 13%.</span></p>  <p><span style="font-size:18px">Panelists at the <strong>Online News Association&#39;s annual conference</strong> last week said that although a <strong>really strong SEO game </strong>generally translates into success with Google Search, they are still experimenting to see what works in Google Discover. Google recommends using "page titles that capture the essence of the content" but discourages "catering to morbid curiosity, titillation or outrage."</span></p>  <p><span style="font-size:18px">Who besides news publishers is benefiting from Google Discover? Watch for updates. </span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item>
<title>Change to Google &#039;Top Ads&#039; definition seems to favor ads over organic results</title>


<description>Google testing placing ads between organic results</description>

<link>https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/mobile-search-marketing/change-to-google-top-ads-definition-seems-to-favor-ads-over-organic-results-3853-thread.html</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:24:41 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/mobile-search-marketing/change-to-google-top-ads-definition-seems-to-favor-ads-over-organic-results-3853-thread.html</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://www.davidhboggs.com/blog/ckuploader.php?action=viewimage&amp;image=Z29vZ2xldG9wYWRzZDA2ZS5wbmc=" style="height:100%; width:100%" /></p>  <h1><span style="color:#990000">Change to Google &#39;Top Ads&#39; definition seems to favor ads over organic results</span></h1>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Google this week updated its definition of "top ads"</strong> in Google Ads Help.</span></span></p>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">Prior to this change, the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/1722087?hl=en-GB"><u><strong>"top ads" help page</strong></u></a> began like this:</span></span></p>  <p style="margin-left:40px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Get your ads above Google search results</strong></span></span></p>  <p style="margin-left:40px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">When people search on Google, text ads can appear above or below the search results. Only up to four ads are eligible to show above the search results.</span></span></p>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">But the new version active today is this:</span></span></p>  <p style="margin-left:40px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Get your ads to show among top ads</strong></span></span></p>  <p style="margin-left:40px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">When people search on Google, text ads can appear at different positions relative to organic search results. <span style="color:#000000">Top ads</span> are adjacent to the top organic search results. Top ads are generally above the top organic results, although top ads may show below the top organic search results on certain queries. Placement of top ads is dynamic and may change based on the user&#39;s search.</span></span></p>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">The practical ramification of this "change in definition" seems to be that some ads appear <strong>between</strong> the highest-ranked organic results, with a net shift in available space toward ads and away from organic results.</span></span></p>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">That makes sense from Google&#39;s perspective, of course, because Google makes its money - <strong>$307 billion dollars in 2023</strong> - by selling advertising.</span></span></p>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">Google also points out on that page that (1) Top Ads need to have <strong>really high Ad Rank</strong>, and (2) Top Ads have <strong>higher costs per click</strong> than run-of-the-mill ads.</span></span></p>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">Google&#39;s suggestions for <strong>getting your ads to the top</strong> are:</span></span></p>  <ul> 	<li><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Improve ad rank</strong> by including more information about your business in your ads - like sitelinks and other assets - to improve expected clickthrough rate.</span></span> 	<li><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Focus on relevance</strong> of ads and landing pages to what users are searching for.</span></span> 	<li><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Bid high enough</strong> to get good ad positions. (They would say that, wouldn&#39;t they?)</span></span> 	<li><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px"><strong>Monitor campaign results</strong> and make continual improvements.</span></span> </ul>  <p><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:18px">I would add to that: find those <strong>3+-word queries</strong> on which you are <strong>most competitive</strong> in your market - especially any <strong>unique to your business</strong> - and let your competitors battle it out for ad position on queries for which you have <strong>no hope</strong> of getting top ad position.</span></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>